Donald Trump's arrogance -- based on the enormous power the United States exercises in world affairs and his own acquisition of vast wealth -- has produced his frequent berating of President Zelensky of Ukraine, as well as his glib talk of making Canada the 51st state and of seizing Greenland, the Panama Canal, and Gaza. It also lies behind Trump's disdain for the United Nations, where all countries -- the large and the small, the powerful and the weak -- have pledged to work for the common good.
The Trump administration is not only firing many thousands of federal government workers, but nullifying union contracts and paralyzing government agencies guaranteeing workers the right to union representation (the National Labor Relations Board) and banning employment discrimination (the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). As he has been following the Project 2025 playbook, he might also be en route to banning public employee unions and empowering the states to ban private employee unions and ignore federal minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor laws.
The whirlwind of Trump administration foreign policy measures -- many reversing those of the Biden administration -- illustrates the fact that Americans have sharply different opinions about their relationship to other nations. At present, the America Firsters are clearly in control of the U.S. government. But the future is never predictable. Indeed, it's quite possible that there will be a revival of the impetus to build a global community -- one that can address the world's problems and even, perhaps, overcome them.
Given the weapons-obsession of the nine nuclear powers, the current prospect for an effective ban on nuclear weapons is bleak. But, longer-term, the revival of a massive nuclear disarmament movement, combined with pressure from an empowered United Nations, could bring these holdouts into the 2021 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and, thereby, avert nuclear catastrophe.
Although the World Bank recently reported that vast economic inequality persists throughout the world, the establishment of a global minimum wage would lift billions of people out of poverty while reducing corporate offshoring of jobs, aiding unions, and curbing mass migration.
The ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza has stirred up a considerable backlash. But, in fact, the world's major military powers have long shown disdain for the international organization, for it has the potential to investigate, prosecute, and convict their own government officials.
The time has come to transform the United Nations into a federation of nations that can effectively uphold international law -- a government for the world. With such a government, we would have a much better chance of restraining outlaw nations and averting the nuclear catastrophe that looms before us.
As I contemplate the current political struggle over the future of the United States, I wonder about the apparent views of many of my fellow Americans. Do they really favor the extremist policies of Donald Trump -- the latest in a long string of rightwing demagogues?
Have human institutions evolved sufficiently to cope with the modern world? When it comes to national security, the answer appears to be: No. Recently, however, there have been efforts to reform the Unied Nations that, combined with the work of civil society organizations and far-sighted government officials, might produce a new and more peaceful relationship among nations.
The Trump-Vance defamatory and baseless attacks on immigrants are nothing new in U.S. or world history. Immigrant-bashing is a deeply rooted political strategy of the economically and socially privileged and their parties on the Right to undermine popular pressure for greater economic and social equality. As many a demagogue or unscrupulous politician has learned, fear or hatred of the "other" can be effective in stirring up a mob or winning an election.