Why has there been a revival of the nuclear arms race?  One reason is that, with the decline of the nuclear disarmament movement, governments have been freer to arm themselves with the most powerful weapons available.  A second, less apparent reason is that the nuclear disarmament movement and government officials alike have forgotten that the motor force behind nations' reliance upon nuclear weapons is international anarchy.

Announcing his candidacy for president of the United States in mid-2015, Donald Trump declared that he would "be the greatest jobs president that God ever created."  In fact, however, during Trump's presidency, the United States suffered a loss of 2.7 million jobs, making him the only U.S. president since 1939 (when the federal government began compiling such statistics) to preside over a net loss of jobs.

The seemingly innocent slogan "America First" goes back deep in U.S. history.  But it began to develop a racist, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, and fascist tone after World War I.  Adopted by the Ku Klux Klan and eugenicists, it was trumpeted before America's entry into World War II by the America First Committee, whose most prominent spokesman, Charles Lindbergh, championed the practices and policies of Nazi Germany.  Even after being alerted to the slogan's unsavory history, Donald Trump has continued to employ it.

Although the popular new Netflix film, Einstein and the Bomb, purports to tell the story of the great physicist's relationship to nuclear weapons, it ignores his vital role in rallying the world against nuclear catastrophe.  Ultimately, that role helped to spark a worldwide uprising against nuclear weapons that led to significant nuclear arms control and disarmament measures, as well as to the end of the Cold War

For some time, it's been apparent that the world's nations are not meeting the growing challenges to human survival.  Among the key challenges are the growing destructiveness of modern war (and, especially nuclear war), environmental catastrophe, and the rise of rightwing nationalism.  But there are indications -- both past and present -- that humanity has the capacity to avert disaster.  

Although, according to the UN Charter, the United Nations was established to "maintain international peace and security," it has often fallen short of this goal, largely because of the hobbling of the UN Security Council.  Even so, new ways have been emerging to provide the United Nations with the ability to take effective action in world affairs.

Vlad the Conqueror laments the fickleness of public opinion -- so easily distracted by the military conquests of inferior leaders -- as well as the lack of appreciation by Ukrainians and Russians for his grandeur.  He wonders: Is that the way to treat a great ruler?

Russia's war upon Ukraine has continued for nearly two years, with terrible human and economic consequences.  Thus far, a Russian veto in the UN Security Council has blocked that international entity from imposing a settlement of the war.  But the UN Charter states that a party to a dispute before the Security Council shall abstain from voting on it.  And, in fact, such abstention was practiced for years within the Security Council.  Therefore, both international law and precedent point toward the United Nations taking action to establish a just peace in Ukraine.

The United States and China lead the world by far in their number of billionaires.  These extraordinarily wealthy people in both nations have a lot more in common with each other than with their fellow citizens.

Although international anarchy has long been recognized as facilitating global conflict, attempts to jettison it have not gone very far.  The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Russian invasion and occupation of Ukraine, and the renewed nuclear arms race exemplify the willingness of nations to flagrantly violate international law when it suits their purposes.  Therefore, if international security is to be attained, international law must be enforced by strengthened international organization.