September 2023 is the sixtieth anniversary of U.S. and Soviet ratification of the world's first significant nuclear arms control agreement, the Partial Test Ban Treaty.  The history of this treaty and its successors shows us that arms control and disarmament treaties have helped to curb the nuclear arms race and prevent nuclear war.  Similarly, the revived march toward nuclear catastrophe can be halted by finally banning nuclear weapons -- if people will demand it.

In recent decades, a segment of the global Left has looked upon the U.S. government as the Great Satan in international affairs, responsible for the world's major ills.  This warped vision became particularly apparent during the Russian government's military invasion, occupation, and annexation of Ukraine, when major organizations with this worldview, although supposedly antiwar and anti-imperialist, focused their criticism on the U.S. government, NATO, and Ukraine and gave the Putin regime a free pass for its imperialist aggression.

The immensely destructive Ukraine War could have been prevented if Vladimir Putin had not been determined to revive Russia's "great power" status or if the United Nations, established to preserve international peace and security, had had the power to take action to stop the war from occurring.  And the war could still come to an end through either the Russian government's concluding that the conflict had become too costly in lives, resources, and internal stability to continue or the countries of the world concluding that it was finally time to empower the United Nations to safeguard international peace and security.

For many years, a portion of the world public has sought to wall itself off from people abroad by hiding behind national borders.  This nationalist approach runs counter to most of the world's great ethical and religious teachings and, also, fails to cope effectively with major problems that afflict the entire world, such as war, climate catastrophe, disease pandemics, resource scarcity, and widespread poverty. Fortunately, however, as the development of international social movements and institutions has shown us, people around the globe can work together in the interest of a brighter future for all.    

In recent decades, the term "Red Lines" has been employed by individual governments -- and especially those of the major military powers -- to warn other nations not to impinge upon their self-proclaimed spheres of influence.  This threatening behavior not only heightens international conflict, but flies in the face of the need to reconcile competing national priorities and enforce international agreements.